Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Sunday, November 6, 2011
On The Personhood Movement...
This whole trend of fetal personhood is really starting to piss me off. And I'll tell you why.
There are the conventional pro-choice arguments (which I love), but this new brand of pro-life venom is particularly perturbing because it leaves out the most important part of the equation:
THE WOMAN.
They spout their theology and their crap about "fetal rights," but the problem I have with them is that they don't mention the woman at all. Not even as "the mother." It's ALL about the fetus. It's as if this fetus is developing in a vaccum, when in fact it is developing in a living, breathing person.
Argument Fail #1:
"Abortions should not be used in cases of rape because it's wrong to punish the child for it's father's sins."
OK. This argument acknowledges the rapist and the fetus, but not the rape victim. It's even worse to punish the woman, who has already been through so much. And let's think about this. What kind of life is that child going to have knowing that it's a constant reminder to its mother of the violence done to her? You can't talk about rape without talking about the woman. You just can't. Leaving her out is like raping her all over again.
There's so much hoopla about fetal personhood, but not enough about female personhood. And that isn't ok.
GAH!!!! *face palm*
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
The 99%
I've seen a lot of these and I wanted to add my voice.
My name is Ali Arman. My dad came to this country and my mom came from a working class home. Both of them sacrificed to I can go to college at UC Berkeley.
My dad made money in the stock market in the 1990s. We're not in the 1%, but we're up there. I have WAY more than I need.
I've dedicated my life since I was 11 to social justice and using privilege for good. But that's not always enough. I support the 99% because I'm part of that 99%, after all.
My name is Ali Arman. My dad came to this country and my mom came from a working class home. Both of them sacrificed to I can go to college at UC Berkeley.
My dad made money in the stock market in the 1990s. We're not in the 1%, but we're up there. I have WAY more than I need.
I've dedicated my life since I was 11 to social justice and using privilege for good. But that's not always enough. I support the 99% because I'm part of that 99%, after all.
Friday, September 23, 2011
Rise of the Eco-Douche
The environmental movement is an important one: we have destroyed our planet. This problem is worthy of our attention and needs a solution. It has caused severe climate change, extinction of species, natural disasters, and other environmental tragidies. However, the movement has given rise to another cultural predator: the echo-douche.
We've all met them, especially here in Northern California. They're usually rich white people who drive a Prius, hassle their neighbors about recycling, shop at Whole Foods, and buy the expensive and trendy "green versions" of products. They're usually the same people who send their kids to private schools, tacitly support tax cuts for the rich, and employ people of color to do the house and yard work that they don't want to do. For them, the green fad/movement has become a way to assuage their guilt and say, to themselves and the world, "I'm not a total asshole, I care about the EARTH!"
These douchebags are everywhere. What makes the eco-douche so special and so dangerous? He has succeeded in taking critical problem and commodified it. Instead of contributing in a meaningful way to a viable solution, the eco-douche has commodified that solution and turned it into a status symbol, an example of the class stratification in the United States. It's expensive to be "eco friendly" (synonym for eco-douche). And it's doing more harm than good.
Take, for example, the Prius. Lovely looking car, great step on the road towards electric cars and less oil dependency. Problematic. Why? Well, it takes more energy and emits more carbon to make a Prius than is saved by driving one. And it's ridiculously expensive, more in the "luxury" category than the "affordable". These are not new or hidden facts. So why do people keep buying them? For the same reason they became eco-douches in the first place: to capitalize on a movement they don't really care about. The Prius is a status symbol of self-importance that says, "I'm better than you because I'm saving the Earth AND because I'm rich."
And then there's Whole Foods. Ugh. Organic food, outrageous prices. There is no reason to shop at Whole Foods (aka Whole Paycheck) when there's a Trader Joe's with the same thing at half the price right across the street (as is the case in my hometown). But the truth is, when the eco-douche shops at Whole Foods, he makes a statement that isn't just about food, just like it isn't really about the environmental movement. It's about the package it comes in. The green movement has been hijacked by capitalism.
The truth is, being "eco friendly" has become the domain of the wealthy and privileged. They don't have Whole Foods stores in the inner city and in low-income areas. Buying any kind of car, let alone a Prius, isn't an option for everyone. When you're struggling to feed your family, you probably don't have the extra money to spend on the "green" brands. The solution isn't more eco-douches, whose products creation, shipping, and handling actually harms more than it helps. The solution is a more accessible movement. The eco-douche shouldn't have a problem with this, because it's about the environment - right?
We've all met them, especially here in Northern California. They're usually rich white people who drive a Prius, hassle their neighbors about recycling, shop at Whole Foods, and buy the expensive and trendy "green versions" of products. They're usually the same people who send their kids to private schools, tacitly support tax cuts for the rich, and employ people of color to do the house and yard work that they don't want to do. For them, the green fad/movement has become a way to assuage their guilt and say, to themselves and the world, "I'm not a total asshole, I care about the EARTH!"
These douchebags are everywhere. What makes the eco-douche so special and so dangerous? He has succeeded in taking critical problem and commodified it. Instead of contributing in a meaningful way to a viable solution, the eco-douche has commodified that solution and turned it into a status symbol, an example of the class stratification in the United States. It's expensive to be "eco friendly" (synonym for eco-douche). And it's doing more harm than good.
Take, for example, the Prius. Lovely looking car, great step on the road towards electric cars and less oil dependency. Problematic. Why? Well, it takes more energy and emits more carbon to make a Prius than is saved by driving one. And it's ridiculously expensive, more in the "luxury" category than the "affordable". These are not new or hidden facts. So why do people keep buying them? For the same reason they became eco-douches in the first place: to capitalize on a movement they don't really care about. The Prius is a status symbol of self-importance that says, "I'm better than you because I'm saving the Earth AND because I'm rich."
And then there's Whole Foods. Ugh. Organic food, outrageous prices. There is no reason to shop at Whole Foods (aka Whole Paycheck) when there's a Trader Joe's with the same thing at half the price right across the street (as is the case in my hometown). But the truth is, when the eco-douche shops at Whole Foods, he makes a statement that isn't just about food, just like it isn't really about the environmental movement. It's about the package it comes in. The green movement has been hijacked by capitalism.
The truth is, being "eco friendly" has become the domain of the wealthy and privileged. They don't have Whole Foods stores in the inner city and in low-income areas. Buying any kind of car, let alone a Prius, isn't an option for everyone. When you're struggling to feed your family, you probably don't have the extra money to spend on the "green" brands. The solution isn't more eco-douches, whose products creation, shipping, and handling actually harms more than it helps. The solution is a more accessible movement. The eco-douche shouldn't have a problem with this, because it's about the environment - right?
Friday, June 24, 2011
I ♥ Sluts
The other day I was coming from ballet and walking back to my car. I'd taken off my tights and was just in my leotard and spankies. This old lady looked at me and said, "Oh honey, don't dress like that. You're gonna get raped."
Really? It's over 90 degrees outside, but I'm supposed to be wearing tights and a sweater because something about my leotard inspires violent and misogynistic crime?
Really?
There is this terrifying culture of "slut shaming" that I see around me, and it pisses me off. When it comes to rape, we as a society are so quick to blame the victim. "She was asking for it because she was dressed that way." I see where this comes from. For one thing, there's the need to paint the victim as being somehow different from us. We need to distance ourselves from her so we don't have to face the fact that we could be her. Then there's the more salient fact that to admit the victim is blameless is to admit that there are problems in our society that make it dangerous for women to walk home alone at night, or wear tight clothes, or even just exist. That's crap.
We need to place the blame where it belongs: with the rapist and the patriarchy who created him. Because if we don't address the actual problem and keep blaming women, we'll never fix that problem and the cycle of violence will continue. As it has. I see it all the time. Men hit on me all the time on BART, on the street, on the bus. They talk to my chest or just stare at me. And I'm not even wearing "slutty" clothes. But even if I were, that's not ok. I don't stare at men's junk through their cargo shorts, do I? It's not ok for women to stare at men's crotches because it's rude, but when men look at me and make me feel really uncomfortable, it's just "boys being boys." Which is just one step away from, "Rape is just boys being boys." Which is "It's men's right to look at you. You're just an object, a pretty thing for their amusement." No. I'm just trying to get to school. Fuck off.
So head high sluts, ballerinas, high-heel lovers, and anyone else. And I will be dressing in my shorts and a low cut top when I feel like it. And I will walk back to my car without having a man accompany me. Why?
Because I should be able to.
Really? It's over 90 degrees outside, but I'm supposed to be wearing tights and a sweater because something about my leotard inspires violent and misogynistic crime?
Really?
There is this terrifying culture of "slut shaming" that I see around me, and it pisses me off. When it comes to rape, we as a society are so quick to blame the victim. "She was asking for it because she was dressed that way." I see where this comes from. For one thing, there's the need to paint the victim as being somehow different from us. We need to distance ourselves from her so we don't have to face the fact that we could be her. Then there's the more salient fact that to admit the victim is blameless is to admit that there are problems in our society that make it dangerous for women to walk home alone at night, or wear tight clothes, or even just exist. That's crap.
We need to place the blame where it belongs: with the rapist and the patriarchy who created him. Because if we don't address the actual problem and keep blaming women, we'll never fix that problem and the cycle of violence will continue. As it has. I see it all the time. Men hit on me all the time on BART, on the street, on the bus. They talk to my chest or just stare at me. And I'm not even wearing "slutty" clothes. But even if I were, that's not ok. I don't stare at men's junk through their cargo shorts, do I? It's not ok for women to stare at men's crotches because it's rude, but when men look at me and make me feel really uncomfortable, it's just "boys being boys." Which is just one step away from, "Rape is just boys being boys." Which is "It's men's right to look at you. You're just an object, a pretty thing for their amusement." No. I'm just trying to get to school. Fuck off.
So head high sluts, ballerinas, high-heel lovers, and anyone else. And I will be dressing in my shorts and a low cut top when I feel like it. And I will walk back to my car without having a man accompany me. Why?
Because I should be able to.
Friday, June 17, 2011
Open Letter to My Nemmy
This is an open letter to my dear friend and second mother, who left seven months ago and hasn't been back since.
Hey.
You've been gone a long time. And now you're coming back, I think, but I'm not sure. This wouldn't be the first time you were supposed to come back into my life and didn't. But that doesn't matter. I know that it's just a matter if time before we're forced back into each other's lives and there are some things I wanna say. Starting with this.
I'm sorry. I did things and said things that, looking back now, are abominable. I'm not going to make excuses and I'm not going to explain, because there are no excuses and there is no explanation. I'm sorry.
I miss having you in my life. You have missed so much. I have too. Makes me sad.
I'm not angry with you. If I said I didn't feel some anger, though, I'd be lying. But I don't hate you. I have never been angry at you. I've been angry at your actions, your words, and your choices, but never with YOU. Please know that.
I do want you back in my life. I don't know if that can happen but I want it to. At this point I guess it's up to you. If you were standing in front of me now, I don't know what I would say about this. And I don't even know what I want to say now, sitting in front of my computer and typing this. Great.
I'm glad that you were able to reach back to me. It gives me hope. I'm not sure what I'm hopeful for, but I know there's hope there. It's out of our hands now :)
I love you, I promise.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Why You Crying?
The other day I was having a terrible day, the kind that makes you feel like the entire world is crashing down around you and you can hardly breathe. I was sitting on a stoop outside the Ballet School when a well-meaning passer by came up to me and asked, "Why you crying?"
I'm crying because Bush initiated the Patriot Act and now my entire Iranian family is on the "no fly" list.
I'm crying because I live in a capitalistic society that measures the value of my person by the value of my capital.
I'm crying because my grandparents don't speak English and I have no way to connect with them.
I'm crying because I'm starving myself in order to feel feminine enough in my culture.
I'm crying because my dearest friend is stuck in a patriarchal relationship in which her fiance won't let her see her friends.
I'm crying because I don't know how much of me is me and how much is constructed.
I'm crying because fix it.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Equal Rights... When It's Convenient
The first time I learned about Afghanistan was when I was nine and the war began. As part of the pro-invastion rhetoric, a lot of time was spent talking about how oppressive their regime was, how poor the people were, and how the United States needed to help them by installing McDonald's and introducing booty shorts (or whatever our democracy plans were). I remember thinking, "Why haven't I heard about this before? I mean, this country didn't just appear suddenly after 9/11 did it?" As I got older it became clearer: the United States government and media has a nasty habit of championing issues when and only when they can be used as a smoke screen for our interests.
In other words, we suddenly care about things when we can use them as poster issues.
Take women's rights, for example. All of a sudden we cared about the state of women in Afghanistan. All of a sudden Afghan women were a top national priority. Nobody cared about them before, but once opposition to the war broke out, "women's rights" magically became the reason we were invading. Anyone who didn't support the war, in addition to being a terrorist and anti-patriot, hated women. Except here's the problem: we never did anything to actually help. We played the colonial game and built buildings, then knocked them down with our bombs. But what makes me the most annoyed is the fact that the same people saying, "We have to rescue the Afghan women," are the ones fighting against reproductive rights and equal pay here in the United States. There's a great SNL quote: Amy Pohler as Hillary Clinton says, "I'm here to talk about sexism, which is an issue I'm surprised people suddenly care about." Afghan women are a means to an end in this situation: they are means of justifying an unnecessary war. We need them to construct our identity as "the good guys." We need them so we can be the opposite of them.
The West in general participates in binary thinking: us v. them, black v. white, male v. female. We are defining ourselves based on what we are not. We are better than this country because our women don't wear veils. Rather than evaluating ourselves, good and bad, we pick a different culture and pick it apart to assert superiority. In WW II it was the Japanese, in the Cold War it was the Russians, and now it's the Middle East.
The United States exists as the other half of a binary rather than an entity in and of ourselves. We need to stop saying, "This is what we are not," and start saying "This is what we are." We need to stand FOR something rather than standing AGAINST it. Maybe then we'll actually start caring about issues all the time, and not just when it's convenient.
In other words, we suddenly care about things when we can use them as poster issues.
Take women's rights, for example. All of a sudden we cared about the state of women in Afghanistan. All of a sudden Afghan women were a top national priority. Nobody cared about them before, but once opposition to the war broke out, "women's rights" magically became the reason we were invading. Anyone who didn't support the war, in addition to being a terrorist and anti-patriot, hated women. Except here's the problem: we never did anything to actually help. We played the colonial game and built buildings, then knocked them down with our bombs. But what makes me the most annoyed is the fact that the same people saying, "We have to rescue the Afghan women," are the ones fighting against reproductive rights and equal pay here in the United States. There's a great SNL quote: Amy Pohler as Hillary Clinton says, "I'm here to talk about sexism, which is an issue I'm surprised people suddenly care about." Afghan women are a means to an end in this situation: they are means of justifying an unnecessary war. We need them to construct our identity as "the good guys." We need them so we can be the opposite of them.
The West in general participates in binary thinking: us v. them, black v. white, male v. female. We are defining ourselves based on what we are not. We are better than this country because our women don't wear veils. Rather than evaluating ourselves, good and bad, we pick a different culture and pick it apart to assert superiority. In WW II it was the Japanese, in the Cold War it was the Russians, and now it's the Middle East.
The United States exists as the other half of a binary rather than an entity in and of ourselves. We need to stop saying, "This is what we are not," and start saying "This is what we are." We need to stand FOR something rather than standing AGAINST it. Maybe then we'll actually start caring about issues all the time, and not just when it's convenient.
Blood Pressure Rising After 60 Minutes
Repost from Facebook, but it's ok because I wrote it :D
A few months ago I saw a 60 Minutes interview with the senator who grew up in poverty and domestic violence, but continues to vote against public assistance even though he himself has benefited from it in the past. It made me angry. I'm so fed up with this neo-liberal, Republican "I came from nothing and pulled myself up so now nobody else in poverty can have assistance" crap.
Scott Brown, I'm talking to you. What you overcame is remarkable but it's time to pay it forward and use the privilege (yes, PRIVILEGE) you have to help people. How can you turn a blind eye, especially when you say you know what it's like to starve, to be abused, to watch your mother get beaten up? If you're not going to help why even hold office? BAH. If you had your way, a kid with your life story wouldn't have a chance. You say your mother was on welfare. Well you want to cut that; how's that kid gonna eat? You say high school basketball was your "salvation" and got you into a good college. If you cut education what's that kid gonna do? No food, no education... that's helpful.
Seriously. I'm so angry. You worked your ASS off and that's amazing, but there are other people working just as hard to get out of poverty who didn't catch the breaks you did, because of their gender, sexuality, race, or just plain circumstances. I mean, you payed for school with a modeling contract. That's a tad bit of luck isn't it? There are people in my classes at Cal who work just as hard for a fraction of the pay. It's time to use what you earned and what you were given to make the world a better place for EVERYONE, not just the wealthy. You wanna make the economy stronger? Cutting public assistance and education is not the best way to start. Try getting rid of some tax cuts. Or military spending. Even though you'll never read this, I'm calling you out. I feel bad for what you went through, but you're on TV claiming it made you stronger. Withholding help from people who need it isn't strength. And lending a hand isn't weakness.
Oh. And FYI. You may not have been class privileged but you were racially and sexually privileged. You see any women or people of color with that story? Nope. What you went through is terrible but it isn't unique. YOU have the power to vote for things that can help stop it. Either help out or shut up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
